<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><updated>2009-03-13T02:47:31Z</updated><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/thread/post/arizona-pictures</id><title>Comments for blog.limedaley.com/post/arizona-pictures</title><entry><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/479/2075</id><title>Comment #2075</title><updated>2009-03-13T02:47:31Z</updated><author><name>jondaley</name></author><link href="https://blog.limedaley.com/post/arizona-pictures#isso-2075" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;It's my first time ever doing one of those panoramic shots - worked pretty well.  I think I worked a little too hard at the beginning matching up points - it didn't auto-recognize any of the points, so I did it all manually.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I started out matching a bunch of points between each picture, but towards the end, got lazy, and started only doing two points - that didn't work at all - and some of the pictures ended up being rotated 90 degrees, so I went back and did three points per picture.  I also did a couple points for pictures that were two &amp;quot;scenes&amp;quot; apart, and that made things work out a little nicer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a bunch of options in &lt;a href="http://hugin.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;the panoramic program&lt;/a&gt; that I didn't understand, so it could probably be done better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, kind of fun - and I'll need to think about this in the future to see if there are other times I should take pictures like that.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>