<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><updated>2010-03-23T20:56:07Z</updated><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/thread/post/reforming-marriage-by-douglas-wilson</id><title>Comments for blog.limedaley.com/post/reforming-marriage-by-douglas-wilson</title><entry><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/591/2569</id><title>Comment #2569</title><updated>2010-03-23T20:56:07Z</updated><author><name>Stephan</name></author><link href="https://blog.limedaley.com/post/reforming-marriage-by-douglas-wilson#isso-2569" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;I'm glad to see Christian authors rediscover beauty, which seems to have been pooh-poohed in too many books (which for instance is in my opinion the main fault of the otherwise excellent every man's battle series).  It's additionally ironic to me that we claim all other created beauty as evidence of a loving creator and then proceed to recommend not looking at any women but our wives, totally ignoring that portion of created beauty - which probably speaks to us of our Creator more deeply than the beauty of a pinto horse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, in our fallen world the longing that the beauty of other women may evoke in us is a temptation to be fought, but I believe it echoes the noble desire for pre-fall peace and community, albeit in a corrupted way.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>