<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><updated>2008-12-05T16:18:03Z</updated><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/thread/post/software-development</id><title>Comments for blog.limedaley.com/post/software-development</title><entry><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/496/2173</id><title>Comment #2173</title><updated>2008-12-05T16:18:03Z</updated><author><name>jondaley</name></author><link href="https://blog.limedaley.com/post/software-development#isso-2173" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The quote came up today on an outgoing email, so I went to change the attribution, and then went to search online to see where else it was found.  I saw the Ganssle article, and the only other source is &lt;a href="http://rickandviv.net/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Rick&lt;/a&gt; who also has a random generator, and someone I know from &lt;a href="http://provchurch.org/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Providence Church&lt;/a&gt;, and probably thought it was pretty good, so copied it from me...&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/496/2172</id><title>Comment #2172</title><updated>2008-11-16T14:45:30Z</updated><author><name>jondaley</name></author><link href="https://blog.limedaley.com/post/software-development#isso-2172" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;So, Stephan is more rigorous than I am, and researched that quote, to find its source was &lt;a href="http://www.embedded.com/story/OEG20021028S0038" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Jack Ganssle&lt;/a&gt;, an embedded engineer whose newsletter I read, and who usually has a joke at the end of the newsletter.  I have my doubts as to whether I saw originally saw it in that exact context, or if it was quoted somewhere else separately, unless I understood at the time that it was a joke, and have forgotten since.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I said to Stephan - Supreme Court justices say all sorts of things you wouldn't expect them to during a hearing, so I (still) don't find it all unlikely that one of them actually did, or could, say something like that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I came across this &lt;a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/07-582.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;FCC indecency transcript&lt;/a&gt; the other day.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/496/2171</id><title>Comment #2171</title><updated>2008-11-15T20:12:42Z</updated><author><name>jondaley</name></author><link href="https://blog.limedaley.com/post/software-development#isso-2171" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;A measure of reliability: 99.999% which translates to ~3 seconds a month when you talk to a webhosting person.  Lots of web providers offer a guarantee of 99.9% uptime, which means they allow for 45 minutes of downtime every month, and basically, aren't guaranteeing anything, since you can generally do three 9s using your home broadband connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, the phrase is being used out of context in the above quote, but you probably get the idea.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And one of my quotes from my e-mail signatures: After the Gore/Bush narrow margin counting, etc. a supreme court justice remarked, &amp;quot;Hey, this is the government. You just can't expect five 9s&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/496/2170</id><title>Comment #2170</title><updated>2008-11-15T20:05:10Z</updated><author><name>IrishOboe</name></author><link href="https://blog.limedaley.com/post/software-development#isso-2170" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;So, a software post that I understand much of is a rare thing, so I'll venture to ask, what's &amp;quot;five 9's&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>