2009-02-25T20:23:31Ztag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/thread/post/think-in-codetag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/476/20662009-02-25T20:23:31Zjondaley<p>The funny thing is that I added more names to make it harder. I suppose if I made it have 26 names then maybe that would lead you astray?</p> <p>I was thinking about one hint, though I didn't want to give it away (only to some). And I'm not sure if the new and improved, secure LifeType will let me do as fancy HTML as used to be possible. Let's see if hovering your mouse over <a href="href" rel="nofollow noopener">this link works</a> (the word that goes in the blank is the clue).</p>tag:blog.limedaley.com,2018:/isso/476/20652009-02-25T20:15:56ZSursumCorda<p>Hmmm. With only 11 unique names, it's not likely to be a simple substitution code. Unfortunately, that's about all the time I'm probably going to put into thinking about it. Stephan might, but he's a bit distracted right now. Maybe Peter?</p> <p>Maybe my brain will take a break from thinking in &quot;write&quot; and subconsciously work on codes for a while. You never know.</p> <p>I did not interpret &quot;thinking in blog&quot; that way -- at least that's not what means it me. It's not primarily that I'm always thinking &quot;I should blog about that,&quot; but that my mind is nearly always writing blog posts, whether they ever see the light of day or not.</p>