<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><updated>2010-03-03T00:03:12Z</updated><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/thread/post/national-treasure</id><title>Comments for sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/national-treasure</title><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/224/771</id><title>Comment #771</title><updated>2010-03-03T00:03:12Z</updated><author><name>SursumCorda</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/national-treasure#isso-771" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hi, Katie -- good to hear from you again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I loved &lt;em&gt;Braveheart&lt;/em&gt;—it was the only R-rated movie we ever took our underage daughter to—but I was severely disappointed to find out later that they'd taken a lot of liberties with history.  (&lt;em&gt;Amadeus&lt;/em&gt; has the same problem.)  I enjoy historical fiction, but only when it's clear what's history and what's fiction.  I wish movie makers would either stick with the truth or make up entirely new characters altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/224/770</id><title>Comment #770</title><updated>2010-03-02T22:44:08Z</updated><author><name>katie baker</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/national-treasure#isso-770" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;What didn't you like about Braveheart?&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/224/769</id><title>Comment #769</title><updated>2010-03-02T01:01:56Z</updated><author><name>joyful</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/national-treasure#isso-769" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;We have friends at church who were amazed we hadn't seen this yet and recommended it to us.  Thanks for another recommendation.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>