<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><updated>2011-07-19T12:45:50Z</updated><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/thread/post/sabbath-by-dan-b.-allender</id><title>Comments for sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/sabbath-by-dan-b.-allender</title><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/619/2391</id><title>Comment #2391</title><updated>2011-07-19T12:45:50Z</updated><author><name>SursumCorda</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/sabbath-by-dan-b.-allender#isso-2391" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oops, I never answered your question, IrishOboe.  The answer is yes, both books justify fun and play on the Sabbath.  And also no:  they (especially Allender; Pieper's book isn't as fresh in my mind) have a view of play that sounds like more work than work to me!  Either I'm misinterpreting Allender, or it must get easier after a while.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/619/2390</id><title>Comment #2390</title><updated>2011-05-01T15:56:53Z</updated><author><name>Kathy Lewis</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/sabbath-by-dan-b.-allender#isso-2390" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;I like your &amp;quot;wrong patient&amp;quot; analogy - I've felt like that with lots of books.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/619/2389</id><title>Comment #2389</title><updated>2011-04-27T11:57:27Z</updated><author><name>IrishOboe</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/sabbath-by-dan-b.-allender#isso-2389" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Does either justify the idea that sabbath is for play and fun?  Not too long ago play was deemed inappropriate for the sabbath.  Why the change?&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>