Comments for sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/thank-you-google

Comment #2763

2013-06-06T18:46:54Z

Oh, the other disadvantage with Thunderbird is that I can't use it online; that is, I have to have my computer with me and can't check my feeds from someone else's. (At least, if I can, I haven't found out how.) But most of the readers I was looking at had the same problem. Sadly, everyone's effort seems to be going into making things work for phones, which at the moment I don't find to be an advantage.

Comment #2762

2013-06-06T18:44:22Z

What I ended up doing was using Thunderbird's "blogs & news feeds" feature, as David July mentioned above. So far I really like it, mostly because it integrates so nicely with my mail. Mostly I delete posts once read, but if there's something I want to save I can easily file it with my e-mails. Also, since I'm checking e-mail anyway, that saves a separate effort to check blogs, which is significant, even with my "slimmer, trimmer" feed collection.

The only negative I've seen so far is that—just like Google Reader—embedded videos don't show up.

Comment #2761

2013-06-06T18:30:41Z

I'm finally trying feedly, and it's driving me nuts. Under "organize" I can't change the order of websites within a category, and I can't see their full titles either so I have several "comments on" or "comments to" listings that I have to click through to see what they are. I keep telling myself everything new takes time to figure out, but it seems to me things are letting less and less intuitive. It's not clear if you click an icon whether something will happen or you'll get a menue of options. Sometimes if you click the title it takes you to the website, other times it opens something within feedly. Grrrr! I don't have time to learn new things, darn it!! I think you did well to stick with what you know!

Comment #2760

2013-05-14T11:56:28Z

Although I'm still thrilled with the housekeeping I did, I'm reconsidering having dumped a feed reader altogether. Although this solution works fine for finding new posts, I'm missing comments that are posted to sites without a "new comments" section in the sidebar. I haven't done anything about it yet -- just thinking.

Comment #2759

2013-03-23T11:35:31Z

I've heard good and bad things about Feedly, though most people seem to like it. It's good to hear another positive vote.

I did think of using Thunderbird for a while (and Porter is still considering it) before I came up with my more minimalist solution.

Comment #2758

2013-03-23T02:38:21Z

I switched to Feedly a while ago when Reader underwent a makeover. I love it. I actually think that it is better than Reader. And now they are working on a clone of the Google Reader API so there should be a seamless transition when Reader shuts down. (though ever the optimist, I expect a few hiccups when it comes to technology)

Comment #2757

2013-03-22T00:19:50Z

Thunderbird is always an option, especially if you are still using it for email.

RSS feed aggregation is the sole purpose for which I use Thunderbird and find it to be an excellent substitute for Google Reader (I moved away from Reader back in 2011).

As a client application, there is a chance of missing content if you do not download RSS feeds for a while. For example, assume that a website you follow is configured to publish the ten most recent posts only. In the interim between using Thunderbird, the site publishes fifteen new posts. The next time you refresh your feeds, you will only get the last ten new posts.

I find this limitation to be a minor one, however. I typically launch Thunderbird daily, even if just to download new content but not read it, and most websites have a higher limit set on their RSS feeds (or do not update frequently enough to matter).

Like Firefox, Thunderbird is easily customizable. In my case, I wrote a userChrome.css file to change the interface to being black which lighter text. That is far more comfortable to me for extended reading.

Comment #2756

2013-03-21T21:38:25Z

Eric: I am not sure if you are asking:

"Why can't I use the google plus bookmarklet,?" or if you are asking, "Why don't you have a google-plus/facebook/sharethis button on your site?"

The answer to the first is that it should work, and is probably a bug in google if it doesn't, and the second is, that SursumCorda could install a social plugin and have as many share buttons as she likes.

I only have a few friends that use google's social network stuff, so I haven't included it on my own pages.

Comment #2755

2013-03-21T18:40:13Z

My first thought when I saw the announcement was "Noooooooo!" followed by "I guess I'd better pare down." I might be able to make your system work if I added a fortnight folder for some blogs...

Also, I have 16 unread items from FPR just waiting for a rainy day. Nice to know someone else besides my brother that reads FPR!

Comment #2754

2013-03-21T17:05:33Z

Thanks, Eric!

I don't know the answer to your question, but I'll forward it to technical support, aka my Lime Daley son-in-law.

Comment #2753

2013-03-21T16:55:06Z

Why am I unable to "1+" this page on google+?!

Comment #2752

2013-03-21T16:52:13Z

A great post! Thanks. Now if someone would just take away our basement, attic and a couple of walk-in closets, we'd really "clean house."

Comment #2751

2013-03-21T14:46:01Z

You inspired me to clean out mine, too. I didn't have as much as you, but plenty with very little action as well. I don't have a solution yet though.