Comment #869

2010-01-08T12:26:02Z

You are right, I'm sure. Perhaps it shows that I have even more autistic traits than I thought. :) It certainly shows why I generally avoid mainstream novels.

Comment #868

2010-01-08T11:29:56Z

Thanks for the review. I agree on many points, but my reception was different on some counts that I'd like to mention.

First, I thought it wasn't bad for the mystery to fall somewhat flat. In a sense, it allows the author to show that dysfunctionalities that we can easily guess at seem a total mystery to one not versed in our skills of dissimulation and duplicity. Not only is the behaviour incomprehensible, it is inconceivable.

Second, the way Christopher narrates and reports vocabulary and behaviour verbatim shows starkly how ugly the people around him are and act. Although you're right that the element of redemption or positive inspiration are missing, behaviour and character traits that would in other mainstream novels be normal, interesting, and acceptable, are shown for the ugliness they are in more "rational" eyes.

I'm not sure if the author intended what I saw and mention above, nor how many people will pick up on it, but I see those as the positive aspects of the book. They are certainly unusual for a mainstream book.

Now if only that honesty with the human condition became usual, and was presented in a more palatable way!

Comments for sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/the-curious-incident-of-the-dog-in-the-night-time

Comment #869

Comment #868