<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><updated>2012-07-11T20:21:29Z</updated><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/thread/post/the-right-to-bare-arms</id><title>Comments for sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/the-right-to-bare-arms</title><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/1033/3781</id><title>Comment #3781</title><updated>2012-07-11T20:21:29Z</updated><author><name>SursumCorda</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/the-right-to-bare-arms#isso-3781" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oh, my.  Where to start on that page?  I'm almost—but not quite—embarrassed enough for his sake to offer my services as a proofreader.  What can one make of a sentence like &amp;quot;Congressman Mica passed an amendment in the House to preserve our servicemen and women in conflict to bear arms and protect themselves&amp;quot;?  (At least he gets the &amp;quot;bear&amp;quot; right, though he reverts in the next paragraph.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I'm not going to go wherever &amp;quot;protecting our 2nd Amendment tights&amp;quot; might lead.  That's probably a legitimate typo, which can happen to anyone, though I'd still hope someone on his staff would catch it.  My own readers aren't slow to help me correct my mistakes!&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/1033/3780</id><title>Comment #3780</title><updated>2012-07-11T20:08:10Z</updated><author><name>Stephan</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/the-right-to-bare-arms#isso-3780" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;I was curious enough to look up his re-election page.  Under &amp;quot;Issues,&amp;quot; he has a &lt;a href="http://www.micaforcongress.com/2nd-amendment-rights/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;&amp;quot;2nd Amendment Rights&amp;quot; section&lt;/a&gt;, where he says the following: &amp;quot;Under the Obama Administration, constraints on U.S. Military in combat have been restricted.&amp;quot;  So, servicemen are freer under Obama?  I don't think that's what he means to say.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/1033/3779</id><title>Comment #3779</title><updated>2012-07-11T20:00:22Z</updated><author><name>Stephan</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/the-right-to-bare-arms#isso-3779" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;And what about my right to arm bears?&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry><entry><id>tag:sursumcorda.salemsattic.com,2018:/isso/1033/3778</id><title>Comment #3778</title><updated>2012-07-11T17:39:04Z</updated><author><name>joyful</name></author><link href="https://sursumcorda.salemsattic.com/post/the-right-to-bare-arms#isso-3778" /><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Well, I'm certainly happy that my right to wear short sleeves in the summer has not been taken from me.&lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>